Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- events:2022:09:14 [2022-09-02 13:10] – created Péter Szigetvári
+++ events:2022:09:14 [2022-09-06 10:54] (current) – Péter Szigetvári
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ''17:00''
-[[https://www.facebook.com/budapestmetaphorcircle|BMC (Budapest Metaphor Circle)]] talk: Ágnes Virág, Hungarian Parliamentary Arena: Co-Work of Figurative Devices in Editorial Cartoons during the Period of Transition (1989–1998)
+> BMC (Budapest Metaphor Circle) talk: Ágnes Virág, Hungarian Parliamentary Arena: Co-Work of Figurative Devices in Editorial Cartoons during the Period of Transition (1989–1998)
+https://www.facebook.com/budapestmetaphorcircle
+Abstract
+Previous cognitive linguistic and semiotic analyses (i.a. Negro Alousque, 2013; Pedrazzini & Scheuer, 2019) have demonstrated that editorial cartoons are rich in figurative
+devices such as metaphors, metonymies, and ironies. These studies, however, usually focus on one or two figurative devices or illustrate their presence with examples taken
+out of context.
+This research calls attention to the co-work of various figurative devices by analyzing the representation of the Hungarian Parliament in editorial cartoons published
+in Hungarian dailies between 1989 and 1998. One of the major novelties of the research is its focus on irony and other culturally determined devices, such as idioms,
+allusions and national symbols, besides conceptual metaphor and conceptual metonymy, in the interpretation of the cartoons. By relying on a unique corpus of editorial
+cartoons that spans three decades, the study aims to provide a comprehensive picture how the conceptualization of the Hungarian Parliament evolved over the years. The
+research operates within the theoretical framework of sociocognitive discourse analysis (van Dijk, 2005, 2008) and cognitive linguistics (Charteris-Black, 2004; Kövecses,
+).
+Keywords: cognitive linguistic, sociocognitive discourse analysis, figurative devices, parliament, editorial cartoons
+References
+Charteris-Black, J. (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
+Kövecses, Z. (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: CUP.
+Negro Alousque, I. (2013) Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. Revista española de lingüiística aplicada, 26, 365-384.
+Pedrazzini, A. & Scheuer, N. (2019) Modal functioning of rhetorical resources in selected multimodal cartoons. Semiotica, 230, 275-310.
+Van Dijk, T. (2005) Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (Eds.) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse
+Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 13] (pp. 71-100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
+Van Dijk, T. (2008) Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach In R. Wodak and M Meyer (Eds.) The Discourse Studies Reader (pp. 62-86). London: Sage.